$40-65
USD/hr direct (60% below US AI/ML)
4+
LLM providers with production experience
5+
Vector DBs in production use across the bench
Why hire AI/ML-experienced Python devs from the Philippines
Production LLM orchestration is real-world experience
Not "I built a chatbot demo." Vetted bench has shipped LLM-backed products with real users: prompt engineering with versioning, retry logic across providers, cost monitoring, content moderation, evaluation harnesses for non-deterministic outputs.
RAG pipeline depth (chunking, embedding, retrieval, reranking)
Semantic search and RAG are stack-heavy: text chunking strategies, embedding model choice, vector DB selection (Pinecone vs Weaviate vs pgvector vs Qdrant), retrieval scoring, reranking with cross-encoders. Vetted bench has shipped multiple RAG implementations.
Vector DB and embedding strategy fluency
Familiar with the major vector DBs and the tradeoffs (Pinecone for managed simplicity, Weaviate for open-source flexibility, pgvector for "just use postgres", Qdrant for performance). Embedding model choice (OpenAI vs Cohere vs sentence-transformers).
$40-65/hr — AI/ML premium reflects thin bench + high demand
AI/ML-experienced Python devs command roughly 25-40% over generalist Python rates. Still 60% below equivalent US AI/ML rates ($150-280/hr).
What this engagement covers
- Senior Python engineers with shipped production LLM-backed products
- LLM orchestration with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Cohere APIs (multi-provider with fallback)
- RAG pipeline build (text chunking, embedding, vector DB, retrieval, reranking, generation)
- Vector DB integration: Pinecone, Weaviate, pgvector, Qdrant, Chroma
- Agent framework experience: LangChain, LlamaIndex, custom agent runtimes
- Model fine-tuning (HuggingFace ecosystem, OpenAI fine-tuning API, LoRA adapters)
- Evaluation harnesses for non-deterministic LLM outputs (LangSmith, Phoenix, custom)
- Production observability for AI systems: cost tracking, latency monitoring, output drift detection
Frequently asked questions
How do I tell a "production AI/ML dev" from someone who built a Streamlit demo?
Ask: "Walk me through your evaluation harness for the last LLM-backed product you shipped." A demo builder cannot answer this; a production AI/ML dev describes the eval framework, the test set, how they detect drift, what they do when a new model version performs worse on key tests, and how they handle regression in non-deterministic outputs.
Which LLM providers does the bench have production experience with?
OpenAI (most common, GPT-4 family), Anthropic (Claude family — growing share), Google (Gemini — growing), Cohere (specialty for embeddings + RAG). Multi-provider with fallback is increasingly the norm for production reliability.
Vector DB experience — which ones?
Production experience across Pinecone (most common, managed), Weaviate (open-source, flexible), pgvector (when "just use postgres" wins), Qdrant (for performance), Chroma (early-stage prototyping). We match the shortlist to your stack.
Can they do model fine-tuning, or just API integration?
Both, but split. Most senior AI/ML bench is strong at API-level orchestration (RAG, agents, prompt engineering). Fine-tuning experience is thinner but available — request specifically. Common fine-tuning work: HuggingFace transformers + LoRA, OpenAI fine-tuning API, domain-specific models for specialized use cases.
How fast from "we need an AI/ML dev" to onboarded?
Typical: shortlist in 7-14 business days (AI/ML bench is thinner so longer search), interviews over 1-2 weeks, paid trial week immediately. End-to-end usually 4-6 weeks to fully onboarded.
Related
More on the same topic
Ready to talk specifics?
30 minutes, no slides, no pitch — just a working session on your engagement.
Book a Discovery Call →
John from California
just requested a quote
2 minutes ago